INTRODUCTION

This special edition of EGG-NEWS highlights the contribution of the AVIX Autonomic Mark II laser wild-bird repellant system to preventing highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI).  The technology was developed in Holland to discourage wild birds from damaging fruit and row crops.  Since introduction, AVIX laser installations have been extended to protect poultry and dairy farms solar arrays, golf courses and electric substations.  Bird Control Group claim close to 4,000 users in 110 nations and their product has received a wide range of awards based on innovation and effectiveness.

HPAI IS TRANSMITTED FROM WILD BIRDS BY THE AEROGENOUS ROUTE

It is now an established reality that migratory waterfowl carry and disseminate highly pathogenic avian influenza virus.  In addition, there is confirmation that domestic non-migratory bird species are susceptible to H5N1 HPAI and are involved in persistence and spread of infection.  This is evidenced by incident outbreaks in backyard flocks that effectively serve as sentinels.  Weekly USDA reports on cases confirm that during March, outbreaks were recorded from California eastward to Vermont and from Minnesota south to Texas confirming that endemic HPAI is potentially present in all states and is no longer confined to seasonal migration of waterfowl.

Preliminary epidemiologic studies by APHIS identified proximity of farms to concentrations of wild birds as a significant risk factor in outbreaks of HPAI.  Since 2022, anecdotal and preliminary field evidence suggested that avian influenza virus may be transmitted over distances of up to a mile if a virus is entrained on dust and dander by high winds.  Avian influenza virus remains viable on moist soil for periods exceeding a week.  The presence of waterfowl in the vicinity of large egg production complexes along the Mississippi and Pacific flyways is well established.  Migratory waterfowl are attracted to wetlands, open water and in some cases effluent and water retention ponds in the vicinity of farms. In an recent evaluation of the standard of biosecurity on a complex in a Midwest state, seagulls were observed perching on the ridges of houses and Canada geese ranged within yards of houses feeding on grass.

A recent publication from Tawain confirmed that concentration of migratory birds on wetlands excrete avian influenza virus detected by air sampling.  In a study conducted between October 2017 and December 2019, 357 ambient air samples were collected and analyzed using rtPCR assay.  Avian influenza strain H7 was detected in 12 percent of air samples and H5 was indentified in 8 percent of samples.  The frequency of isolation related to ambient temperature and the concentration of migratory birds including teal, widgeons, spoonbills and cormorants (Zhang 2022).

A second study conducted by the Wageningen Bioveterinary Research Institute confirmed that DNA from waterfowl could be detected in the incoming air stream of poultry houses that had been depopulated and decontaminated following outbreaks. The area in which the study was conducted was known to have a high population of migratory and resident waterfowl and a history of H5N1 cases. In the study, houses selected for assay were devoid of flocks and the ventilation systems were operated consistent with the respective requirements of flocks that would have been housed.  Air sampling equipment was placed directly in air inlets and parallel samples were obtained from the exterior of sampled houses.  In the case of two empty broiler houses waterfowl DNA was identified in one out of five and one out of twenty-one samples respectively. In the case of a single layer house, two out of twenty-one samples were positive. For exterior air samples, waterfowl DNA was isolated from two out of twenty-one samples. 

Wageningen Institute

These studies demonstrated that commercial poultry confined to power-ventilated buildings may be exposed to avian influenza virus since DNA from waterfowl was detected in the airflow at air inlets.  In the context of units holding 100,000 laying hens maximum airflow would correspond to 600,000 cfm assuming 1.5 cfm per pound live weight.  Air inlet velocities could approach 600 ft/minute at the inlets depending on their collective area and the air displacement rate and number of fans in operation.  The introduction of HPAI virus into a large complex is obviously facilitated by the quantum of air introduced into houses under normal operation with environmental variables including temperature, humidity, wind speed and direction, cloud cover and other environmental variables promoting survival of virus together with proximity to concentrations of migratory waterfowl or potentially infected birds.

Aerogenous transmission of Newcastle disease virus was confirmed during the 1972 outbreaks in Essex in the U.K. and there is no reason to reject a parallel mechanism for avian influenza.

Affected U.K. Broiler complex

Filtration of incoming air to exclude virus and attempts at inactivation are impractical, therefore alternative modalities are required to address this route of possible introduction of HPAI virus.  Even the most stringent structural and operational biosecurity directed at fomites introduced on personnel and feed delivery vehicles cannot provide absolute protection as evidenced by outbreaks on complexes with high standards of protection.  Repelling wild birds is considered to be a practical and cost-effective measure complementing structural and operational biosecurity.  Cannons have proven to be ineffective, installation of screens and wire over lagoons is expensive creating an opportunity for novel approaches including the use of laser technology.

Bosser, A. et al. Detection of airborne wild water bird-derived DNA demonstrates potential for transmission of avian influenza virus via inlets into poultry houses in the Netherlands 2021-2022 Euro Surveill. 2024: 29 doi.org/10.287/1560-7917. ES. 2024.29.40.2400350

Zhang, J. et al. Airborne avian influenza virus in ambient air in the winter habitats of migratory birds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56-15365-15376 2022

EGG-NEWS: Please share some of your background and experience with our subscribers.

Erika Prewitt:

I was born and raised on a farm in central Indiana – mostly row crops and cattle. I earned a bachelor’s degree in agriculture from Eastern Kentucky  University. My graduate studies were at Kansas State University, where I was awarded an MS in genetics and breeding. I served as a teacher at Southwestern Iowa College where I managed the university farm and was responsible for courses in agriculture and animal science

EGG-NEWS:  When did you enter the poultry industry?

Erika Prewitt:

I was recruited by Big Dutchman in 2016 to serve in my current position. 

Fortunately, I had the opportunity to be mentored by Bill Snow, an acknowledged expert in cage-free and aviary systems. He introduced me to practical aspects of rearing and egg production for aviary and barn housing. Working together with customers and applying my basic knowledge of animal science, I was able to apply both theoretical and practical information for the benefit of our customers.

EGG-NEWS:  What is your contribution to Big Dutchman USA?

Erika Prewitt:

I am responsible for guidance, especially for new customers who have converted to aviary rearing and laying systems. I provide support through on-farm consultation and remote guidance as a free service to our customers. Our range extends from a typical 20,000-hen organic barn to a multi-level laying house with 300,000 birds incorporating sophisticated ventilation and lighting installations.

EGG-NEWS. What are the key areas of concentration in rearing pullets to perform to breed standard in laying aviaries?

Erika Prewitt:

I strongly believe that a good pullet is necessary for a successful laying cycle. Management and housing should be appropriate to each of the life stages of a pullet to achieve genetic potential. The design of our equipment is intended to support growth, musculoskeletal development, and flock uniformity.

Areas of concern include achieving a uniform temperature and even ventilation during brooding; ensuring that the flock returns to the aviary at night when they are released at about five weeks of age. Our lighting systems with dimmers create an artificial sundown that encourages return to the aviary with perching. The installation of ramps is necessary for young pullets to learn to move vertically between the tiers and to develop balance and agility.

EGG-NEWS:    Producers appear to be concerned over the transition period from rearing to laying. Have you any observations?

Erika Prewitt:

It is absolutely essential that the rearing system be compatible with the laying aviary. This includes feeding and watering systems and ramps to allow even distribution of the flock among tiers after transfer. Ensuring that levels of light and noise are similar in both rearing and laying houses reduces stress and prevents excitement in the flock that is deleterious to subsequent production. “Walking” flocks regularly through both rearing and the post-transfer period habituate pullets to their environment and hens learn to accept the movement of workers resulting in a calm and productive flock.

EGG-NEWS:    Any additional suggestions to achieve optimal production?

Erika Prewitt:

It is necessary to exercise good stockmanship, recognize deviations from normal behavior, maintain good records, and communicate with suppliers of equipment. Producers should make use of the resources of primary breeders, nutritionists, veterinarians, extension personnel of Land Grant schools, and poultry associations. The gap in production between cage and cage-free flocks has narrowed considerably over the past five years, attributed to better equipment and more knowledgeable managers responding to the needs of their flocks.

EGG-NEWS:    Thank you, Erika.

The performance of a laying flock is predicated on achieving uniform maturity, body weight, and reproductive development consistent with genetic potential. Eggs lost at the beginning of a cycle can never be made up. Attaining an early onset in production, a rapid increase in case weight, a high peak, and persistence are all dependent on the development of flocks from day old through rearing and post-transfer training.

Big Dutchman has acquired experience in the design and manufacture of rearing systems for cage-free production based on the physiological needs of pullets. The NATURA® Filia rearing system incorporates the recommendations of research institutes and producers to apply a range of operational procedures relating to feeding, vaccination, and handling that allow optimal musculoskeletal development and flock welfare.

Big Dutchman NATURA® Filia Rearing System

• Flocks are placed in the lower of the two tiers of the NATURA® Filia system for the brooding phase that extends to three weeks. This allows for optimal visibility, temperature control, and feed intake.

• At 3 to 4 weeks of age, consistent with the management schedule, flocks are vaccinated and are divided evenly between the two tiers.

• At 5 to 6 weeks, doors are opened, allowing pullets to access the aisles and to move between tiers using the ramps, bridges, and adjustable perches incorporated into the system. Both lateral and vertical movement in the NATURA® Filia installation is critical to developing balance and muscle development to allow flocks to adapt to compatible Big Dutchman NATURA® Step or Visio laying systems. Each of the components of the NATURA® Filia is based on a scientific evaluation of the needs of pullets and contributes to uniformity and maturity at the time of transfer, usually at 16 to 17 weeks of age. Features of the NATURA® Filia include:

Construction

The NATURA® Filia incorporates durable construction with floors fabricated from zinc-aluminum coated wire, resistant to corrosion. Support structures are designed and engineered for stability and are compatible with houses over 300 feet. Sliding doors are designed for ease of opening for chick placement and flock transfer.

Sliding doors facilitate chick placement, vaccination and transfer

Moveable partitions are installed at 5-foot intervals on both tiers to confine chicks to smaller groups during the brooding and early rearing phases. The partitions facilitate vaccination or other procedures requiring individual handling of birds. As the flock ages, partitions can be opened to create larger groups within the tier.

Interior view of lower tier during brooding showing moveable partition (rear) and perches above feeder trough and drinker line

Flock Comfort and Development

The NATURA® Filia system incorporates bridges from the lower tier to the floor, ramps between the two tiers, and step platforms. Perches with a patented design are positioned to encourage the flock to face the aisle, allowing manure to be collected on belts. This reduces fecal accumulation along the aisles and reduces the production of ammonia in litter.

Feeders and Drinkers

Each tier is equipped with a proven Big Dutchman chain circuit designed to prevent spillage. Guards are installed in the feed trough during the brooding period.

Perches are installed above the drinker lines and feed circuits to limit soiling.

Drinker lines comprising nipples with drip cups can be raised consistently with the growth of the flock.

Bridges encourage chicks to descend to litter from brooding tier   Ramps allow pullets to transit between tiers   Patented perch design and placement orients pullets to face the aisle   Nipple drinkers with drip cups are located on each tier   Feeder trough fitted with removable anti-waste insert during brooding

Lighting

A range of lighting installations is available including LED fixtures along the aisles and within the system. Compatibility in design between the NATURA® Filia rearing system and the Big Dutchman NATURA® Step and Visio laying installations ensures a harmonious transition after transfer. This reduces stress and excitability in the flock which is deleterious to subsequent production. The lighting system is dimmable and can provide an artificial sunset to encourage the flock to return to the perches during the dark periods.

Strip LED  lighting in each tier, together with aisle installations are dimmable and can be configured for an artificial sunset

Ventilation

Big Dutchman provides compatible ventilation installations including fans, inlets, controllers, and alarms. The NATURA® Filia system is available with an optional air duct over the manure belt to reduce the moisture content of litter and hence production of ammonia.

Dimensions

NATURA® Filia systems are available in two widths to maximize capacity conforming to house dimensions, whether a new installation or a retrofit. The model 1800 has a width of 74 inches. The model 2200 is 88 inches in width. Both systems are 9 feet in height from the floor to the top of the second tier.

Dimensions of NATURA(R) Filia Model 1800   Dimensions of NATURA(R) Filia Model 2200.

Additional information on the NATURA® Filia system is available by clicking on the Big Dutchman logo at the top of this article. Design projections for either retrofits or new houses are available from regional sales representatives or an authorized Big Dutchman distributor.

Epidemiologist affiliated with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the California Department of Public Health have published on their investigations of 46 U.S. human cases of H5N1 influenza1. Cases occurred in six states from March through October 2024 and were associated with occupational exposure among workers involved in depopulation of infected flocks and contact with dairy cattle.

The mild clinical signs including conjunctivitis and respiratory signs were documented. Among the 20 poultry-related exposures and 25 dairy workers, there were no hospitalizations and no evidence of infection among 97 direct household contacts. Only 25 percent of the patients had received a seasonal influenza vaccination over the past 12 months. Among the poultry workers, 65 percent were provided with eye protection and a face mask or respirator, and PPE use was regarded as “suboptimal”.

Inoculation of ferrets with the A/Texas/37/2024A (H5N1) virus led to severe infection and mortality. In contrast the A/Michigan/90/2024A (H5N1) virus was less pathogenic in this laboratory animal. The Texas strain had two changes in polymerase proteins that facilitate replication in mammalian tissue culture.

The severe case of unknown origin affecting a teenager in Canada and the fatal case in an elderly patient in Louisiana were characterized as a D1.1 genotype associated with wild birds. 

An accompanying editorial2 in the New England Journal of Medicine, stressed the following:-

• Collaboration is necessary among agencies and investigators in human and veterinary medicine, public health and occupational medicine.

• Mutations identified in the virus isolated from the case in Canada emphasize the need for surveillance of avian influenza viruses isolated from human to predict changes that may facilitate person-to-person transmission.

• Countermeasures including antiviral therapy and vaccines must be continually evaluated including susceptibility to single drugs or combination of antivirals.

• Prevention of occupational exposure is evident. Apart from providing masks, respirators and face shields, instruction and supervision in their correct use will reduce the probability of infection.

The editorial emphasized the need for balance between “enhanced vigilance and business as usual." Epidemiologic studies are necessary to acquire an understanding of the extent of exposure, viral evolution and transmission. Although the CDC has established that the risk of human infection is currently low the emergence of a contagious strain would potentially be catastrophic. This realization should be a major consideration in suppressing infection in herds and flocks that come into contact with infected birds and animals.

1. Garg, S. et al Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A (H5N1) Virus Infection in Humans. N. Engl. J. Med (2025) 392:843-854
2. Ison, M. and Marrazzo, J. The Emerging Threat of H5N1 to Human Health. N.Engl. J. Med (2025) 392:916-918

Appearing before the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry on February 26th Tony Wesner representing Rose Acre Farms and the egg production segment of the industry advocated strongly for preventive vaccination against H5N1 avian influenza.

Acknowledging the potential restraints relating to export of broiler leg quarter, Wesner stated, “I can’t understand why we all cannot get together with those countries and figure this out, so we don’t ruin trade.” He added, “Vaccination is a serious consideration for HPAI not only for the egg industry but also the turkey and dairy industries which have been effected by the virus.”

Wesner noted that the loss of producing hens will be reflected in lower supplies and higher prices for some time to come, conflicting with the  dministration initiative to reduce food inflation. 

Wesner was supported in his advocacy for vaccination by the National Turkey Federation whose membership has been impacted by H5N1 avian influenza.

In a recent interview on Fox News the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F Kennedy Jr. expressed his opposition to deploying vaccine against HPAI. Citing the absence of proof of ‘sterilizing immunity’ in the event of vaccination, he claimed without scientific evidence and in defiance of logic, that immunized flocks could become ‘mutation factories’. 

The antipathy of the Secretary towards vaccines is well established and his disdain of science and established epidemiology is a matter of record. Unfortunately he has an extensive following and currently exercises influence within the Administration by virtue of his position.

 No vaccine can offer ‘sterilizing immunity’ but effective vaccines can raise the level of population immunity to above the disease threshold. We eliminated clinical poliomyelitis and measles decades ago but now risk of  the return of these and other infections  is evident through the sophistry of charlatans such as the Secretary and his acolytes.

Maintaining large populations of susceptible commercial laying hens that become infected from migratory waterfowl by the aerogenous route will lead to massive proliferation of H5 influenza virus thereby increasing the probability of mutations. Then inserting workers with incomplete PPE protection to depopulate flocks only adds to risk. Gene sequencing has demonstrated mutations in H5N1 in isolates from workers. The emergence of bovine influenza H5N1 type B3.13 and mass mortality in marine mammals confirming contagion, demonstrates the ability of the virus to undergo mutation. At the end of the day it’s a numbers game. By creating highly immunized flocks we will reduce the risk of emergence of zoonotic strains. Admittedly vaccination will result in some genetic drift as in all immunized human and livestock populations but this will be manageable and infinitely preferable to the current situation of ongoing flock depopulation with risk of mutations.

The Secretary is apparently oblivious to the low risk of an emerging zoonotic strain of H5N1 with contagion but is equally unconcerned over the catastrophic economic and human consequences of a pandemic. What will his response be? Mass administration of cod liver oil as ifor the expanding measles epidemic?

This update of U.S egg-production statistics, costs and prices is sponsored by Big Dutchman USA for the information of producers and stakeholders

FEBRUARY HIGHLIGHTS

• February 2025 USDA ex-farm blended USDA nest-run, benchmark price for conventional eggs from caged hens was 740 cents per dozen, up 156 cents per dozen or 27.1 percent from the January 2025 value of 582 cents per dozen. The corresponding February 2023 and 2024 values were respectively $2.11 and $1.33 cents per dozen. For annual comparison, average monthly USDA benchmark price over 2023 was 146.0 cents per dozen compared to 247 cents per dozen for 2024. Stock levels and prices prior to the onset of flock depletions due to HPAI indicated a relative seasonal balance between supply and demand. Future nest-run and wholesale prices will be largely dependent on consumer demand for shell eggs and products and the rate of replacement of pullets and hens depleted due to HPAI. Other considerations include diversion to shell sales from the egg-breaking sector in an interconnected industry.
• Fluctuation in wholesale price is attributed in part to the amplification of upward and downward swings associated with the commercial benchmark price-discovery system in use. An additional factor influencing pricing is the proportion of shell eggs supplied under cost-plus contracts accentuating the upward and downward price trajectory of uncommitted eggs. Highly pathogenic avian influenza is currently the major driver of price with a high incidence rate. Approximately 40 million hens and at least 2.0 million pullets were depleted in 2024 with to 31 million birds in 31 complexes or farms year to date.
• February 2025 USDA average nest-run production cost for conventional eggs from caged flocks over four regions (excluding SW and West), applying updated inputs was unchanged from January 2025 at 76.1 cents per dozen. The February average nest run production cost for other than caged hens was estimated by the EIC to be unchanged at 95.3 cents per dozen. Approximately 60 cents per dozen should be added to the USDA benchmark nest-run costs to cover processing, packing material and transport to establish a realistic cost value as delivered to warehouses.
• February 2025 USDA benchmark nest-run margin for conventional eggs attained a positive value of 663.9 cents per dozen compared to a positive margin of 505.9 cents per dozen in January 2025. Average nest-run monthly margin for 2024 was 170.8 cents per dozen compared to 64.2 cents per dozen over 2023 and 155 cents in 2022.
• February 2025 USDA benchmark nest-run margin for all categories of cage-free eggs attained a positive value of 820.7 cents per dozen compared to a positive margin of 713.7 cents per dozen in January 2025. Average nest-run monthly margin over 2024 was 440 cents per dozen compared with 100 cents per dozen in 2023, relatively unaffected by HPAI compared to the preceding and following years.
• The January 2025 national flock (over 30,000 hens per farm) was stated by the USDA to be down 10.4 million hens (rounded and a probable over-count) to 297.8 million compared to the revised December 2024 value of 308.2 million and relative to 326 million before the advent of HPAI in 2022. Approximately 3.5 million hens returned to production from molt in December together with projected maturation of 26 million pullets, with this number offset by depletion of an unknown number of spent hens.
• January 2025 pullet chick hatch of 28.1 million was up 1.5 million (+5.6 percent) from December 2024 reflecting increased industry demand for replacements of depopulated flocks.
• January 2025 exports of shell eggs and products combined were down 15.9 percent from December 2024 to 369,000 case equivalents representing the theoretical production of 4.9 million hens. Shell egg exports totaling 239,000 cases were dominated by Canada (84 percent of volume) and the Caribbean nations (15 percent). With respect to 130,000 case equivalents of egg products, Japan, (31 percent of volume), Canada, (25 percent) and Mexico, (18 percent) collectively represented 81 percent of shipments. Volumes exported are based on the needs of importers, competition, availability in the U.S. and FOB prices offered.

                      (insert US map showing regions)

TABLES SHOWING KEY PARAMETERS FOR FEBRUARY 2025.

Summary tables for the latest USDA February 2025 flock statistics, costs and unit prices made available by the EIC on March 7^th 2025 are arranged, summarized, tabulated and compared with values from the previous February 10^th 2025 release reflecting January 2025 costs and production data as applicable. Monthly comparisons of production data and costs are based on revised USDA values.

VOLUMES OF PRODUCTION REFLECTING THE ENTIRE INDUSTRY                                                                                   

*USDA Revised

• Revised USDA/EIC Note 1. Texas excluded to maintain confidentiality  

PROPORTION OF U.S. TOTAL HENS BY STATE, 2024                                                                   

Based on a nominal denominator of 282 million hens in flocks over 30,000 covering 95 percent of the U.S complement.

USDA has amended inclusion of specific states in regions and eliminated Texas data to protect confidentiality of Company flock

Sizes

1. Values rounded to 0.1% 

(insert Fig 10 leading states)

Rate of Lay, weighted hen-week (USDA)   81.7%* January 2025.    82.3% January 2025

*Revised USDA

*Revised, using data from USDA Livestock, Dairy and Poultry Outlook February 18^th 2025 taking into account demand from the food service sector and presumably including the effect of HPAI depopulation.

EGG INVENTORIES AT BEGINNING OF February 2025:

EGGS BROKEN UNDER FSIS INSPECTION (MILLION CASES)   December  2024, 6.08*     January   2025,  5.87       

EXPORTS JANUARY 2025: (Expressed as shell-equivalent cases of 360 eggs).

*Representing 1.8 percent of National production in JANUARY 2025 (1.1% shell, 0.6% products).                    

COSTS AND UNIT REVENUE VALUES¹ FOR CONVENTIONAL EGGS FROM CAGED HENS

Notes:   1. Excludes SW and West 

Components of Production cost per dozen:-

Ex Farm Margin (rounded to nearest cent) according to USDA values reflecting FEBRUARY 2025:-

                                                         740.0 cents per dozen¹- 76.1 cents per dozen = 663.9 cents per dozen         (January 2025 comparison:         582.0 cents per dozen – 76.1 cents per dozen  = 505.9 cents per dozen.

Note 1:  USDA Blended nest-run egg price          

1. Unrealistic USDA prices based on promotional prices with few participating stores, non-representative of shelf prices!

      (insert Fig 2 Farm egg value, Fig 3 Consumer retail, Fig 4 Estimated quarterly)

COSTS AND UNIT REVENUE FOR EGGS FROM CAGE-FREE HENS

Components of Production cost for cage-free eggs, per dozen:-

Ex Farm Margin (rounded to nearest cent) according to USDA values reflecting negotiated price for FEBRUARY 2025:-

Cage-Free brown     916.0 cents per dozen¹- 95.3 cents per dozen =  820.7 cents per dozen

January 2025:-         809.0 cents per dozen -  95.3 cents per dozen =  713.7 cents per dozen  

1.       Contract price, nest-run loose. Range 135 to 235 c/doz. unchanged since July and totally unrealistic.

1. Negotiated price, loose. Range $6.00 to $8.98 per dozen
2. Unrealistic USDA values based on promotional prices with few participating stores non-representative of shelf prices!

* Conventional (non-organic) feed

Feed prices used are the average national and regional values for caged flocks. Excludes organic feeds with prices substantially higher than conventional.

This update of U.S cage-free production is sponsored by Big Dutchman USA for the benefit of producers in North America

Depopulation was carried out as required through the fourth quarter of 2024 and has continued through 2025 to date as a result of HPAI. The USDA Cage-Free Report covering February 2025, released on March 3^rd 2025, documented the complement of hens producing under the Certified Organic Program to be 20.5 million (rounded to 0.1 million), up 0.1 million from January 2025. The number of hens classified as cage-free (but excluding Certified Organic) and comprising aviary, barn and other systems of housing apparently increased by 2.7 million hens or 2.7 percent from January 2025 to 103.7 million, despite extensive flock depopulation during the month.

Average weekly production for Certified Organic eggs in February 2025 was up 1.1 percent compared to January 2025 with a questionably high average weekly production of 84.0 percent. Average weekly flock production for cage-free flocks other than Certified Organic was up 3.3 percent in February 2025, but with a high average hen-month production of 82.7 percent, up from 82.6 percent. Seasonally, younger flocks increase the availability of cage-free and organic eggs in response to pullet chick placements 20 weeks previously especially in anticipation of periods of peak seasonal demand.

According to the USDA Egg Markets Overview the categorization of flocks according to housing system among the total of 292 million hens on

February 1^st was:-

Caged, 169 million (57.2% of 292 million hens on February 1^st.);

Cage Free, 102 million (34.9%) with 87% in barns and 8% each on free-range and pasture;

Organic, 21 million (7.2%) with 5% each on free-range and pasture:

There is no adequate explanation for the high production rate especially if the reported number of hens is lower than actual, and in view of a possible undercount following HPAI flock depopulation.

Negotiated nest-run grade-ready cage-free price for February 2025 averaged $7.74 per dozen, up 6.9 percent from $7.24 per dozen in January 2025, reflecting an imbalance between demand relative to supply. The February 2025 advertised U.S. featured retail price for cage-free eggs over only four regions (NE, SE, MW & SC.) was $7.99 per dozen, apparently up $5.11 per dozen from January 2025 based on 62 stores. This compares with 133 stores in January and reflects fewer promotions as the year has progressed reflecting the ongoing incidence rate of HPAI.

The recorded average wholesale price of $7.77 per dozen plus a provision of 60 cents per dozen for packaging, packing and transport, results in a price of $8.37 per dozen delivered to CDs. The average four-region advertised retail price of $7.99 per dozen corresponds to a theoretical average retail negative margin of 4.8 percent (-172.4 percent last month) for promotions offered by the few stores featuring cage-free eggs. Margins are presumed higher for non-featured eggs including pastured and other specialty eggs at shelf prices attaining in excess of $9.00 per dozen in high-end supermarket chains. Retailers maximizing margins especially on Certified Organic, free-range and pastured categories restrict the volume of sales, ultimately disadvantageous to producers.

A research team representing diverse engineering and medical disciplines at the Washington University in St. Louis, has developed a capacitive biosensor to detect airborne H5N1 avian influenza virus.

Virus entrained in air was collected in a wet cyclone with an aliquot of liquid containing virus applied to the biosensor platform.  Using serial dilutions, it was possible to assess the in vitro sensitivity and specificity of the detection system suggesting that the technology could be applied as a cost-effective method of rapidly detecting the presence of airborne H5N1.

Kumar, J., et al, Capacitive Biosensor for Rapid Detection of Avian (H5N1) Influenza and E. Coli in Aerosols. ACS Sensors doi.org/10.102/ACS Sensors.4c 03087 2025

In a recent release, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) noted, “The best way to prevent H5N1 bird flu is to avoid sources of exposure whenever possible.  For people who must have direct or close contact with infected or potentially infected animals help limit exposure to avian influenza viruses using CDC recommendations including personal protective equipment.”

This recommendation may have seemed appropriate sitting in an office in Atlanta away from the reality of dead birds, dust and feathers.  More likely it was Bowdlerized by HSS functionaries attempting to impose distortions and omissions in scientific reality through CDC releases.

If the USDA continues to conduct depopulation as a measure of control for avian influenza, field workers, many illiterate and uninformed of the risks of exposure, will be required to operate under hot conditions and in close contact with dead and dying birds. Despite being provided with masks and respirators, PPE may not be correctly used. Up to 80 workers were infected with H5N1 on dairy and poultry farms in 2024.  Surveillance is minimal and the extent of infection is probably understated.

Surely all workers coming into contact with dairy herds in areas of high prevalence and especially involved in depopulation of infected flocks, should receive the available H5N1 human vaccine in addition to the seasonal trivalent human influenza immunization.  Allowing susceptible workers to come into contact with high levels of H5N1 virus increases the risk of emergence of a mutant, zoonotic strain with human-to-human transmission or initiating the possibility of a recombinant event.

Wayne Pacelle of Animal Wellness Action posted a strong response to the February 26^th “Five-pronged Strategy” announced by Secretary Brooke Rollins to suppress the ongoing epornitic of H5N1 avian influenza.  Pacelle correctly points to the futility of a three-year program of attempting to “stamp out” infection responsible for depopulation of approximately 130 million hens and pullets since the emergence of the disease in 2022.

Dr. Jim Keen, Director of Veterinary Science for the Center for a Humane Economy affiliated with the organization run by Pacelle, is a strong advocate of vaccination.  He stated, “It is astonishing to me that Secretary Rollins is talking about “exploration of a vaccine and therapeutics when what’s needed is on-the-ground implementation of vaccination.”  He added, “There is no need and no time for further R&D on poultry bird flu vaccines as excellent H5 vaccines are readily available commercially.”

It is seldom that EGG-NEWS shares common sentiment with welfare activists but their call for initiation of vaccination of laying hens and turkeys is valid.  Dr. Keen correctly maintains that establishing and maintaining flock immunity is preferable to an ongoing and rolling program of depopulation.

Pacelle stated, “Secretary Rollins is genuflecting to the demands of the trade association representing the broiler industry.”  He added, “The National Chicken Council is opposing a vaccination strategy in the United States even through vaccination is conducted in China, France, Mexico and other countries and appears to be a key factor in limiting the spread of disease and death in birds.”  It is clearly evident that HPAI is endemic in the U.S., having been diagnosed in all 50 states and has persisted since 2022 with a large reservoir of migratory waterfowl and more recently domestic birds and small mammals in addition to dairy herds.

Based on the epidemiologic realities EGG-NEWS finds common cause with these activists in calling for a structured program of flock protection using available vaccines. This prevention modality should be directed to turkeys and egg-production flocks in high-risk areas. Any program should be accompanied by surveillance to monitor immunity and to dect possible emergence of infection in accordance with World Organization of Animal Health policies that permit trade with vaccination.

Wageningen University has recently published on evaluation of two live vectored vaccines to provide protection against H5 avian influenza.  The studies were sponsored by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Food Security and Nature of the Netherlands, after laboratory evaluation showed efficacy and safety. 

The field trial comprised two farms each holding 1,800 hens.  The trial compared Vectormune® AI or Vaxxitek® HVT+IBD+H5 against non-vaccinated controls. Chicks were vaccinated in September 2023 and the longitudinal study will continue through early 2025.

Day-old chicks received either of the vaccines by injection at day of hatch with some pullets receiving an additional booster vaccination at 12 weeks of age.  Irrespective of vaccine applied, at 8 weeks of age, all pullets were protected against challenge with a circulating field strain of H5N1 HPAI under controlled laboratory conditions.  A second challenge was conducted at 24 weeks of age..  Hens receiving either of the vaccines at day-old showed 10 percent mortality on challenge.  Hens receiving both the day-old vaccine and in addition the 12-week booster were clinically unaffected and all survived challenge.  Viral shedding following challenge was sharply decreased in the vaccinated treatments.  Non-vaccinated controls showed 100 percent mortality.

Bouwman, K.M. et al Progress report: Transmission study testing HVT-based H5 vaccine against highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 virus (clade 2.3.4.4b). Wageningen Bioveterinary Research Publications September 2024 doi: 10.18174/669647